Thursday, September 09, 2004
Often Smarter, Always Better-Lookin'
And now, a guest post from my pal Karen, to whom I should just give a key to this blog and let her go, about criticism of the newly released memos regarding Bush's service (or non-service) in the National Guard.
And now, a guest post from my pal Karen, to whom I should just give a key to this blog and let her go, about criticism of the newly released memos regarding Bush's service (or non-service) in the National Guard.
Asked about Killian's statement in a memo about the military's investment in Bush, [Bush spokesman Dan] Bartlett told CBS: "For anybody to try to interpret or presume they know what somebody who is now dead was thinking in any of these memos, I think is very difficult to do."Any ideas?
these are the same people who use the intentional fallacy to argue for strict constructionist interpretations of the constitution and who believe in fundamentalist interpretations of christian scripture. if we can know what st. paul was thinking 2000 years ago and what the framers were thinking 200 years ago, why can't we understand the plain english written by this commander in the 1970s? help me here, somebody!
